Family caregiver quality of life and symptom burden in patients with hematological cancer: A Danish nationwide cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of life (QoL) and the impact of caregiving in family caregivers of hematological cancer patients and its association with patient symptom burden. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including Danish patients (n = 375) and caregivers (n = 140). Caregivers completed scales for anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, health related QoL using the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey, and caregiver roles using the Caregiver Roles and Responsibilities Scale. Patients reported symptoms using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Analysis of covariance was used to examine associations between patient symptom burden and caregivers' QoL outcomes. RESULTS: The results show that caregivers experience sleep difficulties, moderate anxiety, and reduced QoL. Patient symptom burden was significantly associated with caregiver anxiety (p = 0.009), and mental well-being (p = 0.002), while patient treatment status was a significant factor associated with caregiver anxiety (p = 0.016), depression (p = 0.009), emotional well-being (p = 0.002), and sleep (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Caregivers of patients with hematological cancers undergoing active treatment face a high symptom burden, which significantly impacts their QoL, including sleep, psychological well-being, and emotional health. Patients reported a high symptom burden, and patient symptom burden was significantly associated with caregiver QoL. Adequate patient and caregiver support is needed to promote their well-being and mitigate adverse health effects in caregivers, and this should be acknowledged in the context of caring for patients with hematological cancer.

Patient Engagement in Research Scale (PEIRS-22): Danish translation, applicability, and user experiences.

BACKGROUND: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in health research is gaining increased attention and acceptance worldwide. Reliable measurements are crucial to accurately assess, monitor, and evaluate patient involvement efforts in research. The Patient Engagement in Research Scale (PEIRS-22) measures meaningful patient and family caregiver engagement in research. This study focuses on three primary objectives: (1) translation of the PEIRS-22 from English to Danish, followed by linguistic validation and cultural adaptation; (2) assessing the applicability of the Danish PEIRS-22; and (3) focus group interviews to explore the user experiences of PPI. METHODS: A three-phase multi-method study was conducted. In phase one, the PEIRS-22 was translated, linguistically validated and culturally adapted to Danish. In phase two individuals from three distinct patient cancer advisory boards responded to the Danish version of PEIRS-22 to assess its applicability. Three focus group interviews were conducted in phase three, involving individuals from three patient cancer advisory boards. RESULTS: The translation process resulted in a Danish version of PEIRS-22, conceptually and culturally equivalent to the English version. Overall, among individuals of the three advisory boards (n = 15) the applicability was found to be satisfactory, with no missing data and all items completed. The total PEIRS-22 score among the three advisory boards was 85.2 out of a possible 100, with higher scores indicating greater meaningful involvement. A nested sample of the three patient cancer advisory boards (n = 9) participated in focus group interviews. The analysis yielded four themes: (1) The Danish PEIRS-22 captured the intended cultural meaning and contributed to self-reflection, (2) Internal motivation is a driver for involvement (3), Involvement brought a personal sense of empowerment and (4) Meaningful involvement collaborations are fostered by a trustful atmosphere. CONCLUSIONS: The PEIRS-22 questionnaire has been translated, linguistically validated, and culturally adapted into Danish. We propose that the PEIRS-22 is now ready for use in Danish populations. This study provides a Danish version of the questionnaire that can be used to develop patient-centred practices and foster meaningful involvement and collaborations between patients and researchers in the field of cancer research in Denmark. Personal benefits of participating in PPI can vary, and we recommend using PEIRS-22 in conjunction with a qualitative approach to better explore perspectives on meaningful involvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered prospectively on October 22, 2022, by the Danish Data Protection Agency (jr. nr. P-2022-528).

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research can improve research practices by ensuring that patients' voices are heard. Individuals' lived experiences and unique viewpoints can contribute to refining research aims, ensuring they align with the needs and priorities of the target population. There is a growing interest in inviting patients into the research team as patient partners, for example, by establishing patient advisory boards. PPI can also involve caregivers and other stakeholders who are not usually thought of as members of the research team. For that reason, broadening our understanding of establishing meaningful PPI starts with measuring patient and family caregiver involvement. As such, the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS-22) has been developed in the English language to measure meaningful patient and caregiver involvement. In this study, we aimed to (1) create a Danish version of the PEIRS-22 that respects any unique feature of Danish people, (2) assess the applicability of the Danish PEIRS-22, and (3) via focus-group interviews explore the user experiences of PPI. The patients and caregiver who were interviewed as part of the translation process expressed that the PEIRS-22 was easy to understand and captured the intended meanings. Fifteen other patient partners responded to the Danish version of PEIRS-22, and nine of them participated in the focus group interviews. One result was that creating a trusting and social atmosphere within the research group is important for promoting a personal sense of involvement.

Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, there has been a growing international interest in user involvement in healthcare research. However, evidence on the management and impact of patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research remains limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to explore and delineate the current state, practice, and impact of patient and public involvement in healthcare research across different areas of healthcare and patient populations in the Nordic countries. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using nine scientific databases and gray literature from 1992-2023. Sources were categorized as empirical or non-empirical. We used the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public Short Form 2 checklist for reporting of patient and public involvement in healthcare research and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS: A total of 56 publications were included, consisting of 39 empirical and 17 non-empirical sources. Gray literature varied among countries and institutions encompassing different types of documents. We found an increase in the number of publications on patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research. This was evidenced by the growing number of references and institutional initiatives intended at involving the public, indicating the increasing emphasis on patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research. The terminology used to describe patient and public involvement varied over time. However, there has been a gradual narrowing down of terms as the concept of PPI has become more integrated into research practices, particularly with the involvement of funding agencies. CONCLUSION: The utilization of patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research has substantially increased, proliferated, and gained widespread acceptance across diverse healthcare domains. The variety of approaches challenged our scoping review in terms of systematic description and impact. Patient and public involvement was applied in one or more research stages using different methodologies and terms. International agreement on terms and definitions is needed for reliable interpretation of the use of patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research.

Over the past decades the importance of involving patients and the public as active partners in healthcare research has received growing acknowledgement internationally. Nonetheless, our knowledge regarding the degree of patient and public involvement (PPI) in the Nordic countries remains limited. This paper addresses this gap by investigating the status, management, and influence of PPI in healthcare research within the Nordic countries. The review of these aspects has given us a better understanding of PPI and its effects on healthcare research in the Nordic region. We looked at scientific databases and webpages including research papers, commentaries, and other materials from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland. Our goal was to gather information and provide a thorough overview of PPI practices. Our findings showed that PPI is growing with gained acceptance across different areas of health research. PPI was used at different stages of the research process, but there wasn't a common agreement on its importance and the additional value it brings to the quality of research. The study was challenged by the many different terms and definitions, which affected the clarity of our study's purpose (or goals).However, we made efforts to address this by carefully reviewing the different terms and definitions used in the literature, striving to capture the essence of PPI in our analysis. By acknowledging this variation, we aimed to provide a wide-ranging overview while identifying the complexities and nuances related with PPI in the Nordic healthcare research. We assume that achieving international agreement on terms and definitions of PPI would certainly improve the trustworthiness in future reviews.

Life goals as a driving force in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a longitudinal dyadic perspective.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury significantly impacts survivors and their families. Rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury is often complex due to the physical, psychological, and socio-economic problems survivors face. Life goals are considered a motivational factor in rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to explore expectations, problems, and strategies for goal setting in survivors of traumatic brain injury and their family caregivers for one-year during rehabilitation. METHODS: A longitudinal qualitative study using dyadic interviews with survivors and family caregivers was carried out at three time points during the first year following traumatic brain injury. Data was analyzed according to Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eight survivors of traumatic brain injury and their family caregivers completed 24 interviews. Three themes and one sub-theme were identified: 1) life goals as a driving force (subtheme: dyadic discrepancies and conflicts); 2) conflicts between specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timed (SMART) goals and life goals; and 3) changing perceptions of the impact of impairments.Life goals are important motivation in the rehabilitation process. Health care professionals must integrate life goals and rehabilitation goals (i.e. SMART goals) to decrease barriers and survivor ambivalence about rehabilitation. Involving both survivors and family caregivers in goal setting increases rehabilitation success.